Propaganda ≠ Peace in the Middle East

On November 16, 2009, in Israel, Palestinians, by jenhanin

Saban ForumSto­ry­telling is an admirable prac­tice when its pur­vey­ors do so to enter­tain or impart lessons. But what hap­pens when a dis­en­fran­chised group bent on killing you hijacks your his­tory, spins it for their ben­e­fit and hood­winks the rest of the world? This is exactly what the Pales­tin­ian move­ment has done to Israel.

Let’s not for­get the facts. The Pales­tin­ian push for an inde­pen­dent state dates back to the land that Britain occu­pied and named Pales­tine way before Syria, Saudi Ara­bia or Lebanon existed. Then in 1947, the UN parceled out nearly four-fifths of Pales­tine to cre­ate an Arab state, Tran­sjor­dan (now Jor­dan) and ear­marked only one-fifth to cre­ate a Jew­ish state, Israel.

There is a grow­ing belief by much of the world that if Israel stops set­tle­ment activ­ity and turns over land to cre­ate a Pales­tin­ian state than the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict will be kaput. Don’t believe it for a sec­ond. This is pro­pa­ganda. Israel has not had peace dur­ing its 62-year exis­tence even when there were no set­tle­ments. So, I hate to be the one to squash this fairy­tale end­ing but peace can­not occur by legit­imiz­ing known ter­ror­ist fac­tions inside Israel’s bor­ders. The only solu­tion for peace is to elim­i­nate ter­ror­ist threats inside Israel and assem­ble a legit­i­mate Pales­tin­ian state inside jointly nego­ti­ated Arab-occupied land.

But don’t hold your breath for any Arab land offers to cre­ate a Pales­tin­ian state.  The 22 sur­round­ing Arab states advo­cate a Pales­tin­ian state but not on their land.

Instead, for­mer US Pres­i­dent Bill Clin­ton urged Pales­tini­ans and Israelis to return to the bar­gain­ing table at the recent Saban Forum in Jerusalem. Some of the ratio­nale Clin­ton offered only high­lighted the fact that Obama’s recent Mid­dle East diplo­matic efforts deflated faster than Colorado’s “bal­loon boy”.

Clin­ton sug­gested that Pales­tini­ans are hav­ing chil­dren at a faster rate to sup­port his plea to Israelis to cut a deal. He also sug­gested that Hamas might be capa­ble of launch­ing GPS-guided rock­ets from Gaza into Israel’s south­ern bor­der. So when does a for­mer US pres­i­dent pres­sure a coun­try to cut a deal to cre­ate a state based on inflated demo­graph­ics or the threat of technology-savvy ter­ror­ist attacks? The US has long advo­cated a pol­icy that it does not nego­ti­ate with ter­ror­ists. So why would Amer­ica expect Israel to?

But Clin­ton didn’t stop there. He added that the largest dan­ger is nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion that would fol­low Iran’s abil­ity to pro­duce weapons of mass destruc­tion. So now, the US is using the threat of a nuclear Iran to per­suade Israel to cut a deal. This seems anti-American. It’s com­mon knowl­edge that Iran­ian Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Ahmadine­jad called the exter­mi­na­tion of 6 mil­lion Jews dur­ing World War II a “myth”, and has stated that extrem­ist fac­tions should wipe Israel off the map. Hon­estly, would any coun­try want to see a nuclear Iran? Prob­a­bly only one: Iran. Allow­ing Iran to have atomic weapons is about the same as aid­ing Dr. Evil in his attempt to take over the world in the Austin Pow­ers tril­ogy.

But Prime Min­is­ter Netanyahu deliv­ered a promis­ing speech at the Saban Forum that indi­cated that peace is within reach as long as three chal­lenges to Israel’s secu­rity are met:

“First, Iran must be pre­vented from devel­op­ing a nuclear mil­i­tary capa­bil­ity. Sec­ond, a solu­tion must be found to the threat of mis­sile and rocket attacks. And third, Israel’s right to defend itself must be pre­served not only in prin­ci­ple but in practice.”

But unwill­ing­ness to nego­ti­ate on the Pales­tin­ian side reared its ugly head when Pales­tin­ian lead­ers from Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Abbas on down side­stepped Israel to secure sup­port from the UN Secu­rity Coun­cil. A uni­lat­eral dec­la­ra­tion not only vio­lates Israel’s right to reach an agree­ment on the bor­ders of its coun­try but it under­mines the 1995 Oslo-derived agree­ment that nei­ther side should take uni­lat­eral steps affect­ing the sta­tus of the ter­ri­to­ries. Abbas has also made men­tion of mak­ing East Jerusalem the new Pales­tin­ian state’s cap­i­tal when this would go directly against the 1947 UN Par­ti­tion Plan that claimed Jerusalem as neu­tral territory.

How can global cit­i­zens help the peace process along? We can start by dis­cred­it­ing Arab manip­u­la­tion of Israeli and Jew­ish his­tory. There needs to be an inter­na­tional con­dem­na­tion of Arab coun­tries and their lead­ers that try to rewrite and reframe the his­tory of Israel and Jews world­wide. This can only occur when US lead­ers assess ret­ri­bu­tion to Arab coun­tries that con­demn and attack Israel instead of push­ing for a two-state solu­tion with groups that have sworn to elim­i­nate Israel.  At the end of the day, long-lasting peace and sta­bil­ity can only occur if Israeli and Jew­ish his­tory remains intact, ter­ror­ist groups like Hamas and Hezbol­lah splin­ter and both par­ties reach a coop­er­a­tive peace agreement.

Related posts:

  1. Apartheid in the Mid­dle East
  2. Peace or Pipedream? Pales­tini­ans Must Pick
  3. 400-Pound Bomb in Belfast Has Impli­ca­tions on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Prospects